Winston Churchill said
Si Vis Paceum Para Bellum

Sam Adams, more than beer

“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, — go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen”
Samuel Adams

Lincoln on power

"We must prevent these things being done, by either congresses or courts — The people — the people — are the rightful masters of both Congresses, and courts — not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it —" Abraham Lincoln

Saturday, January 5, 2013

Another complaint filed with Gannett of Kaul

Since the alleged writer Kaul has decided that NRA members and members id Congress should be murdered, There are ethics complaints being filed with the parent organization Gannett. Ity seems that calling for the murder and torture of people is against their code of ethics.

Of course if anything is done will be a whole other matter. But in the mean time, Kaul should be carful about pissing of people that are known gun owners. We do after all know where he lives.

Donald Kaul 
841 Asa Gray Dr 
Ann Arbor, MI 48105 
(734) 994-0144

If you want to file your own complaint, contact Ms. Wall at,

Ms. Wall,

On Sunday, Dec. 30 th 2012,  columnist Donald Kaul has came out of retirement to write a horrific screed in which, because he disagrees with their suggestions to stop school shootings, he appears to accuse N.R.A. members of  not caring  that 20 children were murdered in their school. As a NRA member this could not be farther from the truth.

One of his points in the article calls for designating the NRA as a terrorist organization, simply because they hold beliefs with which he disagrees. This also could not be farther from the truth . NRA members are dedicated to promoting safety and preserving our rights, all of them, codified in the Bill of Rights. Isn't there something in your policy about being committed to diversity? Or is it only a commitment to diversity that you don't disagree with?

Also he points out The Second Amendment protects an individual, civil and human right to own and carry guns, yet he then calls  for the imprisonment and/or murder by police of those of us who chose to lawfully exercise this right (I'm sorry but I can read his statement "' prying the guns from their cold, dead hands' thing works for me" as anything other than a direct threat to my future well being .

Speaking of threats, he suggests that certain political leaders, simply because he disagrees with their political beliefs, should be dragged to death behind a truck unless they agree to abandon their principles. Again is this the sort of "commitment to diversity" your company tolerates and encourages? The direct trheat of violence of a public official is also a felony.

I find it hard to believe that the editorial board of the register would even allow such treats to be published. I do understand that gun control can be a very emotional subject. But for a "writer" to theaten violence against law abiding politicians and citizens is unbelieveable. I further believe that the editorial board should be reprimanded for this screed that does nothing to further the debate, and Kaul should be banned from writing articles, he's retired, he needs to stay there.

Here is a link to the article in question;

Robert A. Fowler Jr.

Thursday, January 3, 2013

Gun Control Tramples On The Certain Virtues Of A Heavily Armed Citizenry

It is time the critics of the Second Amendment put up and repeal it, or shut up about violating it.  Their efforts to disarm and short-arm Americans violate the U.S. Constitution in Merriam Webster’s first sense of the term—to “disregard” it.

The Second Amendment was designed to ensure that individuals retained the right and means to defend themselves against any illegitimate attempt to do them harm, be it an attempt by a private outlaw or government agents violating their trust under the color of law.  The Second Amendment was meant to guarantee individuals the right to protect themselves against government as much as against private bad guys and gangs.

Read the rest here

Wednesday, January 2, 2013

What Fineswine wants

Diane Fineswine wants to disarm every American. It has always been her goal.

That;s the way to trample on the oath she took to support and defend the Constitution. She would wipe her ass with the Constitution in a hot minute. We need to be writing our Senators and Representatives and make she she never has the votes. Remember, tomorrow she is going to introduce a bill that will ban almost every gun in the country. It probably won't go anywhere, but why take the chance. With Obama and Biden on the case she's getting some high powered help.

write your Senator

write your Representative



Monday, December 31, 2012

What you'll see in the revolution

Perhaps 50-100 million firearms currently owned by law-abiding citizens will become contraband with the stroke of a pen. Citizens will either register their firearms, or turn them in to agents of the federal government, or risk becoming criminals themselves. Faced with this choice, millions will indeed register their arms. Perhaps as many will claim they’ve sold their arms, or had them stolen. Suppose that as many as 200-250 million weapons of other types will go unregistered.

There is not going to be any "registration", period. The next step would be confiscation and from there it's just a short stroll to a camp for "re-education".

The 535 members of the House and Senate in both parties that allowed such a law to pass would largely be on their own; the Secret Service is too small to protect all of them and their families, the Capitol Police too unskilled, and competent private security not particularly interested in working against their own best interests at any price. The elites will be steadily whittled down, and if they can not be reached directly, the targets will become their staffers, spouses, children, and grandchildren. Grandstanding media figures loyal to the regime would die in droves, executed as enemies of the Republic.
You can expect congressional staffs to disintegrate with just a few shootings, and expect elected officials themselves to resign well before a quarter of their number are eliminated, leaving us with a boxed-in executive, his cabinet loyalists trapped in the same win, die, or flee the country circumstance, military regime loyalists, and whatever State Governors who desire to risk their necks as well.

Most of the police and military will abandon their jobs rather than follow a unconstitutional law. Going on a raid to confiscate weapons would be a suicide mission. The ones left would be wondering who is going in first, and surly die.

Write your Senators, both of them

Write your Representative, write the ones on either side of you too

Hell, send them a link to the article. Maybe they will get the message, or maybe not.

Todd Hartley: I'm With Stupid The longer the weapon, the shorter the tool

So, since I'm not particularly concerned about the National Rifle Association ruining my political career, I'll be the one to say it: If you own multiple guns or feel the need to possess a military-style assault weapon, it's because you have a small penis.

Get that gun owners. It doesn't matter if you are male or female, if you own one of those "scary assault weapon" you have a small pee pee.

Freud call the fear of weapons a sign of retarded sexual maturity. Hmmm, Freud got the retarded part right.

Now, I know a lot of you are probably saying to yourselves, “But Todd, plenty of women also own guns. What about them? Do they have small penises, too?”
My answer to that question would be: yes. Yes they do. Women who own assault weapons have tiny penises, just like their male counterparts. That would explain why they're angry enough to buy a weapon whose sole purpose is to kill as many people as possible as quickly as possible.

Wow, We have facts and figures that show the truth, and they have penis jokes.

A old mariine

Thanks Old NFO

Sunday, December 30, 2012

Anti Freedom quotes

Banning guns is an idea whose time has come.
Joseph Biden
quoted by AP
U.S. Senator

Yeah, The Vice President really believes in the Constitution.

There are a lot of quotes here that are just unbelievable.

We must get rid of all the guns.
Sarah Brady
Phil Donahue Show

Department of pre-crime?

We must be able to arrest people before they commit crimes. By registering guns and knowing who has them we can do that... If they have guns they are pretty likely to commit a crime.
Mary Ann Carlson
State Senator (VT)

To hell with the constitution...
Mike Roos
on the constitutionality of the Roberti-Roos assault weapon ban
Assemblyman (CA)

These people scare me. They want the government to be the only ones with arms. That's called a police state and they are fine with it.

Thanks to Western Rifle Shooters Association

Pete the Penguin

Blog Archive